Farms and Biogas
Dairy farms and other confined animal feedlots, especially larger ones, are under
increasing public and regulatory pressure to manage their animal manure to control environmental problems. A
major concern is odour, which has been a prime force behind local ordinances to control feedlot expansion.
There are also potential problems with storing and spreading the manure, along with the potential for spills.
Anaerobic digesters have come into their own over the last several years for their potential to address some
of the environmental impacts of manure management while providing farmers with economic benefits (Nelson and
Lamb).

In a large scale system raw manure is processed using an oxygen
free container (heated if in colder climates), allowing digestion that began in the cow’s stomach to continue and
be enhanced. Products of anaerobic digestion of livestock manure include a combustible gas (i.e. biogas), liquid
effluent, and digested solids.
The liquid effluent is a low-odour fertilizer with
characteristics closer to commercial fertilizers that provide more flexibility to farmers in land application. This
can often be substituted for the increasingly expensive commercial fertilizers. The phosphorus (P) rich digested
solids are commonly used as bedding for cows, but also have value as soil supplements either on agricultural lands
or for landscapers and greenhouses (Kramer).

The development of anaerobic digesters for
livestock manure treatment and energy production has accelerated at a very face pace over the past few years.
Factors influencing this market demand include: increased technical reliability of anaerobic digesters through
the deployment of successful operating systems over the past decade; growing concern of farm owners about
environmental quality; an increasing number of states and federal programs designed to cost share in the
development of these systems; and the emergence of
new state energy policies designed to expand growth in reliable renewable energy and green power markets (AgSTAR
Program).
A vast array of anaerobic digesters have been developed and placed in operation over the
past fifty years, and a variety of schemes could be used to classify the digestion processes. When
considering waste from a dairy, the most important classification is whether or not it can be used to convert
dairy waste solids to gas while meeting the goals of anaerobic digestion. The goals of dairy waste anaerobic
digestion are as follows:
·
Reduce the mass of
solids
·
Reduce the odours associated
with the waste products
·
Produce clean effluent for
recycle and irrigation
·
Concentrate the nutrients in a
solid product for storage or export
·
Generate
energy
·
Reduce pathogens associated
with the waste

The processes that have been used for digesting dairy waste can
be subdivided into high rate and low rate processes. Low rate processes consist of covered anaerobic lagoons, plug
flow digesters, and mesophilic completely mixed digesters. High rate reactors include the thermophilic completely
mixed digesters, anaerobic contact digesters, and hybrid contact/fixed film
reactors.
Western nations have until recently, been much less enthusiastic about biogas technology
than most third world countries. The basic older style digester is labour intensive, and until systems became
mechanised and automated there was little uptake in the West. These automated large scale farm biogas plants
are on the scale of town sewage plants and capital costs can run into millions of
dollars.
Most of this section has been about large farm
digesters, but medium biogas systems with volumes ranging from 50 m3 upward for cattle, pigs and/or poultry can still be built
using the Chinese and Indian designs seen on page
7. Of course this size digester is not just the
domain of farmers, and restaurant owners or collectors of food waste could construct a digester as their waste
products a perfect feedstock.
In the Build-A-Biogas-Plant
Member’s Area documents provide guidance on screening for project
opportunities, selecting a gas use option and conducting
site-assessments to identify technically appropriate and cost-effective biogas recovery processes for your
farm.
References
Kramer, 2008. Wisconsin Agricultural Biogas Casebook,
http://www.build-a-biogas-plant.com Member’s
Area (accessed 22 April 2010).
Nelson and Lamb, 2002. Final Report: Haubenschild Farms Anaerobic
Digester,
http://www.build-a-biogas-plant.com Member’s Area (accessed 22 April 2010).
|